View Single Post
Old 04-05-2024, 05:39 PM   #15
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,185
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: VFACTS April 2024

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Cozzo View Post
Why not right - especially if you cull off the other stuff they offer but move nothing of, allows them to put a bit more coin into what they do want to sell.

Curious to see what the current gen Ranger offers over its 10 year or so life span of the platform.
Most, if not all the T6 development team is gone and disbanded..
Whatever vehicles we have now is it except for a possible future hybrid/PHEV option.

And yes, I would agree that filling out the range with more options would grow sales
it’s annoying that Ford didn’t offer the 2.3 EB as an option on the Ranger and Everest
as they are options available overseas…

It’s also annoying that Ford never considered a RHD development of the smaller Maverick pickup
Internal dimensions are close to Ranger in a FWD or AWD package that’s way more fuel efficient

Last edited by jpd80; 04-05-2024 at 05:48 PM.
jpd80 is online now   Reply With Quote
This user likes this post: