|
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 07:36 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 89
|
I was just wondering if the BA xr6/xr8 cars or such E- series cars are better then mustangs. im talking respectable mustangs not the 2005. lil earlier ones. EG 1967.
|
||
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 08:00 PM
|
#2 | ||
|
Last warning
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Victoria HeadCount: 3
Posts: 11,194
|
better in what way exactly?
__________________
FALCN6 - Turbo, Air Bag Suspension - Hibernating EL GT - Supercharged NASCAR - 83 Thunderbird , Bagged DAILY - BA Fairlane Ghia, Boss 260 Turbo OFFROADER - Ford Explorer 
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 08:04 PM
|
#3 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South East Melbourne
Posts: 6,156
|
You asking if cars with 40 years of refinement are better than 1960's Mustangs? No shit they are.
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 08:20 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
TBA Customs
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: giving you what you need
Posts: 3,275
|
In what way do you mean better??
Killer looks = Mustang Refinement = Late model
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 08:40 PM
|
#5 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 89
|
Peformance/power
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 08:42 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 89
|
WHat about the newer mustangs compared to new x8's
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 08:42 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
BOSS 5.4L Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,935
|
Late model Falcon will eat a classic Mustang....
But a Mustang will alway be loved by nearly everbody and you can improve perfomance. |
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 08:50 PM
|
#8 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 89
|
What about new mustangs vs new baxr8's
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 08:54 PM
|
#9 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Ah yes, but more importantly .....ARE THEY BETTER THAN SITUPS?
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 09:08 PM
|
#10 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 89
|
situps :S ?
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 09:23 PM
|
#11 | ||
|
AU II XR8
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: melbourne
Posts: 978
|
new falcon will beat mustangs XY GTs etc
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 09:26 PM
|
#12 | ||
|
The one and only
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Carrum Downs, Victoria
Posts: 9,053
|
1973 Boss will s**t all over my blown LTD!
__________________
1992 DC LTDHO 360rwkw built by me Tuned by CVE Performance Going of the rails on a crazy train Other cars include Dynamic ED Sprint, Dynamic DL LTD, Sparkling Burgundy DL LTD, Yellow, Red & Blue XB sedan & Black XB Coupe
|
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 11:21 PM
|
#13 | ||
|
AFF Post NAZI
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Albury
Posts: 3,634
|
lol though a worked XW will thrash a ba xr8 lol
__________________
"Its not always about power, The car has to handle Beautifully" |
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 11:26 PM
|
#14 | |||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 11:31 PM
|
#15 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
![ten[A]cio[U]s's Avatar](image.php?u=10683&dateline=1382916548)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wagga Wagga
Posts: 2,507
|
Dads 1966 stang has more torque then a new GT but has a 40 year old 289. When the 347 is dropped in it will have around 500+rwhp and far far more torque.. So when they are worked yeah they can beat newer cars. But if they are both worked, it will be much closer.
Stock vs Stock, newer should win though..
__________________
Daily: AU Forte Wagon Project: AU Fairmont - Wants to be turbo The Family Car: 2009 G6E Turbo Future fun: 1968 Ford Galaxie 500 |
||
|
|
|
|
16-11-2006, 11:32 PM
|
#16 | |||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wagga Wagga
Posts: 2,507
|
Quote:
 :
__________________
Daily: AU Forte Wagon Project: AU Fairmont - Wants to be turbo The Family Car: 2009 G6E Turbo Future fun: 1968 Ford Galaxie 500 |
|||
|
|
|
|
17-11-2006, 09:02 AM
|
#17 | |||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
Otherwise see if you can borrow a XW or XY, GTHO even. If you do try braking into a corner and then attempt to round the corner and exit cleanly under power. Try the same thing in a BA. You might notice a slight difference........ Now repeat this a few times and you will find your drum brakes in the Mustang/XW are on holiday. |
|||
|
|
|
|
17-11-2006, 09:28 AM
|
#18 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wagga Wagga
Posts: 2,507
|
I was joking mate.. Sorry bout that
 : I have driven the mustang and it is really fun to drive but is far from practicle.. They have the turning circle of a bus, the clutch is as heavy as hell, and the toploader is very very clunky and a bugger to use.. Plenty of $$ have been poored into the suspension and brakes but still doesnt handle nearly as well as a modern cars.. And as for the drum brakes, they are pathetic lol. When the diff is converted to 9" we are upgrading to disc's.
__________________
Daily: AU Forte Wagon Project: AU Fairmont - Wants to be turbo The Family Car: 2009 G6E Turbo Future fun: 1968 Ford Galaxie 500 |
||
|
|
|
|
17-11-2006, 09:31 AM
|
#19 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Posts: 3,926
|
I already know whch one will win, based on respect and the coolneess factor alone.
|
||
|
|
|
|
17-11-2006, 09:40 AM
|
#20 | ||||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,602
|
Quote:
The XR8 does weigh in at 1795kg - about 200kg more than a Mustang
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
All vs Mustangs
Linear Mode
