Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25-02-2006, 03:29 PM   #31
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

When i drove my mates alloytec we both named it "Mary". He tried, and failed to light her up, then I tried with the same result.

If this motor produces 170 odd killerwatts Ill stand rooted. It may very well on an engine stand, but there's NO way the ECU was letting it make that power (or rather torque) as publicised on the engines spec sheets.

It will not turn a tyre in the dry, sure it's an auto, but it's got an open wheeler diff and skinny dross rubber !!! Jesus, my old XF would thrash one wheel, and I'm guessing it made all of 100 KW !

I wonder what the ECU lets MARY really produce when it detects WOT and foot on brake ? It is not 170 watts, yet alone the bigger ones ! This is not a criticism of mine, I couldn't care less, but there you go !

He HATES this car, paid mid 30's for it OTR, had consisdered a XR6, and would dearly love to offload MARY for ANY car that consistantly makes what the manufacturer quotes.

How aggressive is the ECU on Ford IL6 engines ??
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-02-2006, 03:53 PM   #32
Danny
GT4.
 
Danny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,218
Default

Hmmm. Ecu shouldnt murder the power of a car.... I dont know what you're getting at.
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-02-2006, 04:11 PM   #33
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny
Hmmm. Ecu shouldnt murder the power of a car.... I dont know what you're getting at.

Its called TORQUE LIMITING STRATEGY, apparently the ECU / PCM retards ignition / fuel to prevent drive train damage.

I could be wrong here, and no doubt will be told so..... but others on this forum told me this when I posted a ' road test' of Mary some time ago.

Anyone from Holden MC to confirm / dispute this ??

Ive read else where about this referred to by some as "take the fun out" software.

Not sure if Ford employ such ECU / PCM strategies..........
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-02-2006, 04:32 PM   #34
Wokkas
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 735
Default

Welcome to the world of fly-by-wire.

My Boss motor doesn't always do what my right foot tells it to. I'm hoping an edit will fix it.
Wokkas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-02-2006, 04:39 PM   #35
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wokkas
Welcome to the world of fly-by-wire.

My Boss motor doesn't always do what my right foot tells it to. I'm hoping an edit will fix it.

It will !

Well, I found my 8 to be more consistant feeling after flash. Pre flash, sometimes it would feel as if it was down on pwr (relative to normal baseline) during a sustained hard flog. It was only a feeling.... I never was able to really quanitfy it. Starngely, on the dyno we found my 260 to be extremely consistant, run after run............

Surely it wasn't just the placebo effect after the flah tune. Was it ????
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-02-2006, 04:48 PM   #36
sphell
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
sphell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tex
Its called TORQUE LIMITING STRATEGY, apparently the ECU / PCM retards ignition / fuel to prevent drive train damage.

I could be wrong here, and no doubt will be told so..... but others on this forum told me this when I posted a ' road test' of Mary some time ago.

Anyone from Holden MC to confirm / dispute this ??

Ive read else where about this referred to by some as "take the fun out" software.

Not sure if Ford employ such ECU / PCM strategies..........

I can vouch for that! We tried to light up a VZ's tyres (ON A PRIVATE ROAD!)and it just would not happen! It just squatted down and sat there. I even tried turning the wheel and hooking it round in a 'donut' fashion and the best I got was a small chirp from one of the wheels. We also noticed that if you put the car in Neutral then floor the pedal, the rev's will hold at 4000rpm. Then if you dump it into Drive, the rev's drop right down to idle before it engages the gear. THERE IS NO WAY WE COULD GET THE ALLOYTEC POS TO DO A BURNOUT! I totally agree with your 'take the fun out' software statement

My BA on the other hand will light up the right rear quite easily if I don't have tools in the car
sphell is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-02-2006, 08:30 PM   #37
vztrt
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
 
vztrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: vztrt is one of the most consistent and respected contributors to AFF, I have found his contributions are most useful to discussion as well as answering members queries. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M&Ms
Yeh i noticed it a few months back when Holden did that VZ2 press release thingy before xmas. The higher tune 3.6 V6 is still at 190 KW although it has dropped from 340 Nm to 335 Nm. Makes you really commend Ford on their efforts to not only hold the same power levels, but to increase them slightly too (182 -> 190 KW).
Does anyone know what the torque of the EUROIII compliant Commo is??
vztrt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL