![]() |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Just an interesting anecdote, I have no interest (no pun intended!), in trying to predict the movement of house prices.
A mate that lived two doors down from me put his house on the market two years ago. It passed in at auction for $720 000. He wanted more so decided to hang on to it and rent it out. Yesterday the house across the road went to auction; it’s a similar house on a block 50 meters bigger, deceased estate. The house across the road sold for $535 000. Some of my neighbours were shocked and believed they personally had just lost a lot of money. |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
If I paid $500k for my house and it is now worth $2.50 the I have lost nothing unless I sell it and then of course I can buy another one for $2.50. If I sold it for $1,000,000,000,000,000,000 the situation is the same. The biggest whingers in these threads have almost always been renters who cannot afford to buy a house and so therefore are deriding those who have. Bottom line: If you are paying $500 a week rent waiting for the market to drop all of that money is gone and you have nothing. If you pay $500 a week off a mortgage and the value drops you still have the house. If the economy completely collapses (as the doomers keep rabbiting about) then money will be worth nothing so it does not matter how much you have AND there will be no rental properties as they will all be sold or repossessed so the clever renters will be the ones in the tents....... |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
As for your bottom line , You mention renting and waiting would leave you with nothing and if you had bought you would still have something . I would be inclined to think that if one does rent and wait and if the market does collapse as you mention then they would have the opportunaty to have a mortgage od what what they would have if they purchased earlier , yes the earlier owner would have something and that would be double the mortgage for the same property . |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
You are born, you work, you die. If you spend $500 per week regardless of on what that money is gone. In the case of renting after spending $500/wk for 20 years you have $ZERO In the case of buying after spending $500/kw for 20 years you have a house that may have cost $300k and is now worth $2.50 which means you have $2.50 more than the renter. If you own the house outright and sell it you have a bucket of money and nowhere to live. You could then rent and over a period of time you would use up your money and HAVE NOWHERE TO LIVE. If you are paying off the house you can't sell it without finalising the loan so unless you sell it at a loss, which would be stupid as you then have nowhere to live unless you rent or buy another house, you are getting nowhere. I really shouldn't complain though. People who think like you are giving me money every week to pay the mortgages on my rentals which, regardless of how much less they may be worth in the future, they are costing me nothing..... |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
Now just keep paying your rent...... |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
And don't worry , I will keep paying my rent in the meantime:yummy: |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Sometimes I wonder if its even worth having a nice house and property, or even renting. you end up a slave to the bank and your employer.
When you've got big responsibility to a bank you cant just wake up one morning and decide to do something else for work, take a pay cut and start out new. Then when you have your mortgage paid off, you're "too old" to get another job, no one wants to hire people in their 40s/50s it seems even though you have a good 15 years left in you maybe even more. Part of me says living in a caravan in a park wouldn't be too bad, you own your caravan, your car, pay your money for a powered site and stack shelves 2 days a week and spend the next 5 doing what ever you want. Sure you might not have the house with 50 bedrooms, the obligatory 5 60" TVs, 4 car garage but I bet you'd still be happy. Plus you can move around easier than if you wanted to sell your house/property and move. |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
Mr Smith , we have been hearing this forever and a day. One thing that many are unaware of is the fact that household mortgage debt is now double what is was in 2005. That leaves a lot less money to be spent elsewhere. When you have to keep gail kellys pay packet topped up at 15 million dollars a year for one employee , you know that something has to give somewhere. Sometimes jokes like this can be funny for only so long before reality kicks in . Reality is now kicking in, the joke is over. I think it was her that acknowleged that the joke was over with this thread title. So strait from the horses mouth it would seem. Hard to argue with the horse |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
I think that Danno makes some good points but I would like to make some more.
1. Rent is no more 'dead money' than is interest paid to a bank 2. Accepting the payment of interest as a trade off for capital gains is akin to gambling 3. In the last 10-15 (actually excluding the last 2) years a massive credit boom and favourable demographics saw house prices inflate massively > it is not the norm, this period was an anomaly! 4. Some people made a lot of money from this but this does not necessarily make them smart people, but rather lucky people 5. We are constantly fed a diet of misinformation that property ownership is a guaranteed path to untold riches 6. Inadequate regulation of the real estate and finance industries has seen too many people become far too leveraged through what is essentially coercion. 7. The above people are in for a lot of pain as "doubling house prices every 7-10 years" is NOT sustainable and your house is worth only as much as people are willing to pay for it |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
[QUOTE=DANNO178]Rich , well I guess that depends on who you are and how you look at things. I have sold my house for close to 1 mil last year , debt free. I did have it all in the bank getting interest of 6% . Rates have now dropped and are dropping. So I have diversified my money. In july I purchased 60 oz gold at 1565, it was 1565 at the time but I paid 1580 per ounce from the perth mint with theirvadd on cost. I also purchased just over 8000 ounces silver n august at just under 30 dollars an ounce. Over the last two weeks I have purchased just on 150 k in gold stocks and the rest is in the bank. So you are quite welcome to follow what I have done and see how I go . I'll then let you decide weather I am rich or not.:notworthy
And don't worry , I will keep paying my rent in the meantime:yummy:[/QUOTE Hmmmm......... |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
[QUOTE=buggerlugs]
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Compound growth is over rated for the most part. Its all about inflation proofing your assets. I have looked at properties this way since I was about 23 or abouts. Bought me first house and paid as much off as fast as I could. Got rid of that mortgage in about five years. Bought number two and pumped as much as I could plus the rent and paid that off in about five years. Bought number three. Used the rent from number two plus as much as I could afford plus the rent from three into number three. That was paid of in about three years. The process goes on. I can now buy a reasonably priced house and pay it off without using any of my salary. Now have 12 houses. Ten of them are paying off the last two. I wouldn't recomend any more than that. It becomes a full time job to manage them. Its is virtually tax free income as well, as long as you have a professionally created depreciation schedule for each house. That costs about $500 to $600, but is tax deductable. Work the system and it will work for you.
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
With mining costs of 50 dollars a tonne they were making 140 propfit per tonne, then at 86 we make 36 dollars per tonne profit. Se we now make about quarter of the profit we did a year ago. The prices bubbled up went through the roof and have now collapsed, sounds like another market I was once invovled in , where the prices bubbled up and went through the roof , while I stuck for the first two , I was not waiting around for the third of the inevitable scenarios so I sold out. |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
age and postion . |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
Properties have only lost value if I were to sell them. None of my properties are worth less now than when purchased. Rents are always increasing. With the amount of people that are selling because of mortgage stress or default the demand for good quality rentals is increasing. Houses will always take back losses incurred by the market. Plus where else can I earn an income of around 4.5K a wwek and pay virtually no tax?? |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
Not ready to retire yet. I am 53. I use the depreciation schedule to offset any tax. Each house has an average of 8K per annum in depreciation. EG the average anual income from each property is about 18K that comes back to 10k when applied. When it is all added up and the Gumbyment tells me how much I owe them because of the risks I took and the hard work that I did it, is uasually close to being zero. In fact last year I got a return of 8K. I am thinking that industrial property might be a smart way to go. A mate has a couple that seven eleven lease from him. Each returns 11K per month. 8k after tax. thats pretty good but they can be expensive to get into. |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
I help build ambulances to make my coin.....
That coin is silver and round. |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
Only owe about 200k spread over two properties. That will be gone in about 18 months. BTW all my hoses have been either built by me or less than 3 years old when purchased. In a funny twist of accounting the best performing property that I have is in Cooktown. It is about 3 acres backing onto the river. It has been leased by some hippy nudists for about 10 years!! :yelrotflm I just love doing the inspection trips for that one !!! |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
If ya need a hand on inspection day , just give me a yell , you can drive while I enjoy the scenary.:evill |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
|
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
Just saw my post and could not edit it. In the third sentence I said "Anybody can't start investing this way ". What I meant to say was " Anybody CAN start investing that way".. I am very sorry about that . |
Re: Compound growth in house prices over ?
Quote:
When I was five years old , my oldies bought a house next to some hippies and they would all walk around naked . They were only there for a year or so before a family moved in . This was in Sydney suburbia not Byron bay. |
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 03:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au