![]() |
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | ||
not here much anymore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
|
sorry if this has already been covered somewhere else, i had a look and didnt find it
As the title suggests, what are the pros and cons of a Turbo or Supercharger Application? As I understand it a Supercharger is easier but does not get as higher figures as a Turbo? (Or am I way off). I know virtually nothing about Turbos or Superchargers so as much info as you have would be great.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,382
|
Ive heard somewhere that with superchargers your limit to pulley ratios compared to turbos where tuning is virtually unlimited. With turbos you just tap into the exhaust.
Superchargers have smoother delivery of power while, while turbos kick in. Superchargers draw some of the power from the crankshaft but make up for it turbos increase backpressure. This is all the shit ive found on the net |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
LPG > You
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
|
Superchargers, Centrifugal, Twin-Screw and Roots are less efficient, end of story. They all incur higher parastic loss then a turbocharger does and will all produce less power in any given application. They'll all also be worse on the fuel efficiency side of things.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1. ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Dyno Tuner
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,408
|
pro-charger, get the best of both worlds
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
LPG > You
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
|
Not really. Centri's give you the parasitic loss of a s/c combined with the lag of a turbo. They're the most space efficient type of forced induction though... and yes, Pro-Charger's rock
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1. ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
not here much anymore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
|
Ok to further things a little I will be honest and say I am doing my homework on a suitable boost application for the Focus. It's only a 'what if' at this stage but I would like to know as much as I can about it.
I am not really keen on turboing as from what I know (very little) it needs a lot of added piping, oil lines etc. I dont want anything that is difficult to add or remove to the engine as it is now, which is why I was thinking a Belt driver supercharger might be a suitable option. kW increase in number is not important to me - I'll take whatever i get as long as someone in the know can tune it for me and they are happy with the figure, then so am I. What's a "pro charger"?
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,382
|
Id say a turbo for the focus. I really think there isnt any point in having them on anything smaller than a V8. Doesnt supercharging require a lot of engine work?
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Ich bin ein auslander
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Loving the Endorphine Machine
Posts: 7,453
|
yeah, what is pro charger?
__________________
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional! |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Rider on the storm
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 317
|
I'd personally go for a turbo. By definition, a centrifugal 'charger is driven off power- think `air con for your engine'. It might make up for it in additional kw, but taking energy from the engine to force in more air can't be good for mileage.
Turbos however run off the otherwise `wasted' (on an N/A car) energy from the exhaust (air pressure, sound, heat), but it does make things more complicated. Expect more power from a turbo than a mechanical supercharger, but either way, both methods aren't going to be a) cheap b) easy. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Banned
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
|
With your car being an auto, I suspect that it'll change gears before a turbo has a chance to really spool up (depending on how highly strung a setup you have)
Supercharging small fours isn't that common, and turbocharging is usually more popular due to a four's ability to rev. The higher the revs, the higher the flow, the highter the exhaust gases --> turbo spools up, then forces more air into the engine through adjoining impellor. Forced air (+ fuel added) makes its way thru engine, goes thru turbo, turbo forces more air into the engine, and so-on. A centrifugal supercharger is basically a turbo, but instead of using the exhaust gases to drive it, it uses the crank (thus sapping engine power). A rootes/twin screw supercharger uses the crank to rotate a set of rotors or helical screws which stuff more air into the intake manifold, giving a pretty-much flat (and fat) torque curve throughout the rev range, so you technically get max boost the whole time. Downside is, the blower can only be driven by the crank to a certain speed before limits come into play such as frictional/inertial sapping of power from the crank, or metallurgical limitations of rotating parts, or the strength of the belt, etc etc. (this is coming off the top of my head, if any of this sounds like crap, please correct me!) I remember reading an ad a while ago for supercharging setups for Hyundai Excels... But usually people go for turbos, because the 4's strong point is its revs, and that's what the turbo works off ;) ;) Ugh, it's 4.30am, and I'm halfway thru an assignment due in 4.5 hours... neeeeeed coffee -Dave- |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
Why would you want to bother boosting a Focus? I mean, they're an okay car for a shopping trolley but why would you even bother trying to make it go fast? Last edited by Mike Gayner; 20-05-2005 at 06:21 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
they call me Tibbo
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,163
|
Quote:
What a silly comment or are you just trolling for a bite. :yeees:
__________________
|
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
No longer driving a Ford.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
|
I think a turbo would make more sense - it's what I would go for personally. Reason being that you can drive around at low revs and not have the turbo spool up, so then it'll be as if there is no turbo there, so no fuel econ hit as well as it still being nice and easy to drive. Also that way, if you want that power from the turbo, all you have to do is let the revs climb and bang, there's the turbo spooling up and off you go. If you go for a suitable turbocharger (seeing as you're not going for any world records in power), it will have very little "turbo lag" because as a general rule, the bigger the turbo, the more power it can make but also the longer it takes to spool up and hence you get more "turbo lag".
Now, for comparison a supercharger is always on, and as has been said above, saps engine power to make it work. So at low revs, while it will be boosting your engine, it will also be using some of the engines power to do that. End result being, if you're cruising along at 1500rpm (for example), the supercharger will be working, you'll be making a little more power then you normally would at those revs, but you'll also be using more fuel then you'd expect, because while your engine will be making slightly more power then it would without the supercharger, if you take out of the equation the extra power the supercharger is making, the engines power will actually be down, while still using the same amount of fuel, as a result of the engine also having to drive the supercharger. So to use some (admittedly rubbery) figures, lets say the supercharger saps 20% of your engine power to run, but you end up with a 10% increase in engine power through the rev range. That would mean that, for that 10% increase, the supercharger is actually contributing 30% of the power, so instead of a 10% increase in fuel usage, you would be looking at more like 15% or perhaps higher, with the important part being that it would be all the time, even when you're driving like a granny, unlike with a turbo. Personally, I think a supercharger is more suited to a 6 or 8 then a 4, and I'd personally prefer to be able to drive off boost if I want to as you can with a turbo. But I hope I've been helpful in telling you what I'd consider the advantages and disadvantages of each are. PS Racecraft, I wouldn't worry, from my experience, some people just don't seem to like 4 cylinders, I know my Escort is no shopping trolley, LOL!
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by The MaDDeSTMaN; 20-05-2005 at 09:32 AM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
Adapt or perish...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dip!@#$
Posts: 7,954
|
Quote:
B2TF, it's good you've bought up something like this, because later on, I'm looking at boosting the ute, but don't know which way to go. Any other bits of useful information would be great right now.
__________________
Carless
|
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,359
|
Quote:
__________________
Turbo AU ute ~ Nice legs, shame about the face. 282rwkw at 15psi. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,359
|
Quote:
I would not supercharge a car if turboing was an accessible option. The ability to upgrade is the major reason. If the turbo is correctly sized lag will be minimal. My falcon has a 700hp turbo on it and it gets boost at 2000rpm. :sm_headba Mine is auto as well. But if I had a V8 and was after forced induction I would supercharge just becuase you can get off the shelf kits for the windsor and that helps when you want to get it all engineered and passed emission testing. Arent off the shelf turbo kits available for the focus?
__________________
Turbo AU ute ~ Nice legs, shame about the face. 282rwkw at 15psi. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 975
|
I reckon a turbo focus would be pretty cool, theres heaps of small fwd drive cars geting around with turbo's its just a matter of finding a kit for one or getting it custom built - proabaly looking at 4-8k mark same as boosting a falcon?
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
No longer driving a Ford.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
|
Does anyone disagree with what I wrote, or did I have it about right?
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
LPG > You
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
|
Quote:
As for why would you bother boosting a Focus... it's a small light car, it doesn't need much power to be exceptionally fast. The Focus weighs 1218kg (2680lbs) with a full tank of petrol... now lets add, say, a 100kg driver (1318kg or 2900lbs). With 190kW (255hp) and assuming you get a good run, that's a 13.7 - 13.8 @ 95 - 100mph. So on average, low 14's, from a little FWD hatch. Power/Weight is a good thing. It needs only 300hp to run 13 flat. What's a big, heavy Falcon do with 300hp? 350hp and its running 12.3 - 12.4's etc etc. Turbocharging is definitley the way to go, Roots yeilds too much heat and parasitic loss, and extreme expense and difficulty to intercool properly, Twin-Screw is the same, just not as bad.. and Centrifugal is only really good if you wish to be different or have little to no underbonnet space. It's simply a crank driven turbocharger. Centri's are really screwed because they get the deficiencies of a Supercharger and a Turbocharger rolled into one package. You get the parasitic loss of a Supercharger (being crank driven), yet they need to spool up, just like the turbo, so you lose the whole "constant boost advantage" that Superchargers have. Besides, a properly setup turbocharger system will have little to no lag, and make bucketloads of power from low rpm to redline.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1. ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
XB in parts...
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,890
|
Quote:
I'd also recommend the turbo. You'll prob find a lot more info re turbo'ing the car versus s/c'ing and like other's have said, you're prob better off. Here's the link for procharger (i'm guessing this is what was being discussed earlier) http://www.procharger.com/
__________________
Daily Driver 2019 Ford Escape...looking for XR6T's. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#21 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Australia
Posts: 3,173
|
It depends a lot on what you want as well... if you want a flat and fat torque curve go for a Positive Displacement Supercharger... otherwise i would go for a turbo as im not a fan of centrifugal blowers...
There are quite a few forced induction kits avaliable for the Focus. I know Ford Racing have a PD kit avaliable and so do Cosworth. BTW I am putting a PD supercharger on my Zetec engined Escort in the future.. as far as intercooling I will be using a water to air intercooler which is much easier to package in a tight engine bay than a normal air to air intercooler... but is more expensive.
__________________
'09 SYII TTG | Mystic '06 BF XR6 | Mercury Silver
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||||
Rider on the storm
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() You could also say a V8+forced induction=crazy amounts of power, which also = insurance cost & labour cost & materials cost... |
||||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
they call me Tibbo
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,163
|
yes a supercharger for a V8 as you only need one... THrow in the v configuration and you'll spend twice as much on goodies....
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#24 | ||
not here much anymore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
|
Thanks heaps for all the info guys, please keep it coming.
From what you've all said it sounds like a Turbo is a better way to go, Supercharged sounds nicer :P but if a Turbo is a better choice who am I to argue. Yes Focus off the shelf Turbo kits are available however I dont know much about them or where to even get them - if possible I dont want to have to import stuff myself, Id rather buy it all and get it fitted at the same place if possible. InFocus Motorsport.com.au say they have one coming but there arent many details about it beyond that. Now realistically what I am looking at for a project like this? I am aiming on a budget of $3k or as close as possible, I think this may be a little unrealistic? Also, would the use of a Unichip/Aftermarket ECU be required for this sort of thing? I want it to be as simple as possible.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||||
No longer driving a Ford.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 2,969
|
Quote:
Of course, turbos can also suit 6s (Typhoon, XR6T, Skyline and MANY others) and 8s (although it's obviously more of a pain to fit a turbo or twin turbo on a V config engine if it doesn't already have one), and an amazing amount of power can be made. As has been said, it all depends on what you're after. Oh, and the reason I made such a deal of fuel economy was because, unless I'm mistaken, one of the reasons for back2thefutura buying the focus was because it was more economical to run then the Falcon he previously had.
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |||
not here much anymore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
|
Quote:
Sounds like Turbo is the way to go - actually i remember hearing about a Turbo Focus in Adelaide which I think may have been done by CAPA? Does anybody have any details on it? Ive emailed them but I only did it last night so I dont expect a reply just yet.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
|
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#27 | ||
Fordless
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,122
|
Ultimately I beleive the autorotor twin screw superchargers are the best form of forced induction as they are more efficient & produce much lower boosted air temps & power loss. They also produce almost constant boost yet have a by pass so on light throttle no boost is entering the engine & it drives & has the ecconomy yet as soon as you stomp on it the by pass closes & you have full boost.
Kenne-Bell makes some great setups with these but unfortunately for you not the Focus so I'd recomend a setup that has already been tried & tested rather then going to the time & expense of coming up with your own solution |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |||
Rider on the storm
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 317
|
Well, although biased, Google turned up this;
http://turbochargedpower.com/Turbo%20vs%20Blowers.htm Quote:
Last edited by Biggoggs; 20-05-2005 at 08:00 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#29 | ||
they call me Tibbo
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 6,163
|
3k might get you the turbo and some plumbing NEW...
If you are budgeting on 3k B2TF spend alot of time on research, the Focus is 2l, so look around and ask questions on what type of turbo guys are using, the specs of the turbo wether its for a Ford or not the specs will be very close if you stick to EFI 2ltr stockies. Keep your eyes on EBay or even the ForSale sections of some of the ricer forums, Boost Crusin', Silvia etc for a cheaper kit someone is offloading. The only thing you'll have to purchase Focus specific (if your not a dab hand at welding)is the manifold.
__________________
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |||
LPG > You
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
|
Quote:
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1. ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |